Overview of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the attempt to mirror human intelligence/cognitive functions within a machine. By harnessing the power of algorithms and sophisticated data analysis, these machines garner the ability to learn from past experiences, adapt to novel scenarios, and execute tasks that traditionally necessitate human insight.

Machine learning, an integral subset of artificial intelligence, concentrates on crafting algorithms and statistical frameworks that empower computers to extract insights and form decisions anchored in data. At its essence, ML revolves around facilitating machines to recognize patterns, much akin to human learning, albeit at a vastly accelerated pace.

The process of ML is fairly straightforward. When provided with fundamental guidelines, an ML system can be devised to identify trends or forecast outcomes based on specific data. Various methods, including supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, are used to develop

these models. Essentially, these approaches focus on refining a sequence of weights and structures, optimizing them to draw accurate conclusions from the given data. In order to do so, ML hinges on three cardinal components.

● Training Data: Think of training data as the foundational bedrock of ML. It's this data that the algorithm harnesses to form predictions or categorize fresh data. Varied in nature, training data can encompass visuals, textual content, numerical metrics, or even an intricate blend of these facets.

● Model Architecture: This encapsulates the blueprint of a machine learning model. Envisage it as the skeletal structure that determines the design, the diversity and quantum of layers, the activation mechanisms, and the intricate interlinkages between nodes or artificial neurons. Tailoring this architecture hinges on the unique challenges posed by the problem statement and the nature of the data at hand.

● Model Parameters: Delving deeper, we encounter model parameters - the crux of the learning process. These are the dynamic values that a model imbibes during its training trajectory. Adjusted in a continuous loop, these parameters are finetuned through optimization algorithms to bridge the chasm between projected outcomes and actual results.

Large Language Models (LLM)

A language model is a specialized machine-learning tool designed to generate and predict coherent language patterns. A simple illustration of this is the autocomplete function, which many users encounter daily. Large Language Models (LLMs) stand at the forefront of advancements in natural language processing (NLP). Characterized by their extensive training on vast datasets, LLMs are aptly named for their expansive nature. These models are adept at a wide spectrum of tasks, from recognizing and translating text to predicting or even generating content.

At their essence, LLMs can be likened to neural networks (NNs), sophisticated computing systems modeled after the intricacies of the human brain. These networks operate using an intricate arrangement of nodes, layered in a manner reminiscent of neuronal configurations.

At their core, language models determine the likelihood of a specific token, or a series of tokens, appearing within an extended sequence. When visualizing a token as a word, the model discerns the probabilities of diverse words or word combinations filling in a given blank space. This "sequence of tokens" isn't confined to just a word or two; it might span entire sentences or even multiple sentences.

Human language, with its intricate nuances and vast scope, demands sophisticated and resource-heavy modeling. A marked trait of these LLMs is that as they expand in size, they also escalate in intricacy and efficiency. Whereas initial models were adept at anticipating the probability of individual words, contemporary large models can project probabilities for entire paragraphs or comprehensive documents.

The surge in the scale and prowess of language models in recent years is attributable to several factors: enhanced computer memory, elevated processing power, and the advent of innovative techniques adept at modeling extensive text sequences. These computing advancements are important because one of the defining attributes of LLMs is their vast array of parameters. Conceptualizing these parameters can be likened to a knowledge reservoir that the model accrues during its learning journey. It is this repository of insights that steers the model's nuanced understanding and response mechanisms.

Training Large Language Models: A Two-Step Process

Analogous to the human cognitive process, these models undergo an initial phase of pre-training, followed by meticulous fine-tuning. These stages can be explained in the following way:

● Training Phase: Every LLM begins its life with the training phase, akin to a rehearsal for ML models. This process exposes the model to vast volumes of unlabelled textual data with the primary objective of determining the subsequent word in a sentence or deciphering hidden words in a sequence. This phase is crucial as it enables the LLM to grasp linguistic patterns and structures. By delving deep into grammar, syntax, and semantics, the model begins to discern the intricate relations between words, laying a robust groundwork for comprehension. This iterative process, which often spans numerous cycles or epochs, gauges the model's prowess against a distinct validation dataset, ensuring it doesn't merely memorize but genuinely learns.

● Inference Phase: Having established foundational knowledge through training, the LLM now enters the fine-tuning or inference stage. Here, the model undergoes training on data pertinent to a distinct task, refining its parameters to enhance output precision and deciphering data to make informed predictions. Like a seasoned professional, the model incorporates the inputs, processes it through the parameters it has cultivated, and culminates in a coherent output, be it a specific classification or a prediction.

Issues with Training Large Language Models

While the development of AI (and AGI) is fraught with ethical and political dilemmas, a very tangible risk posed by AI's capital-intensive nature is the centralization of power among a few key companies. The inherent network effects, coupled with economies of scale derived from vast data infrastructures, could potentially empower dominant entities in the AI sector to impose restrictive gatekeeping measures, either by levying exorbitant fees or lobbying for regulatory capture. Such patterns are becoming increasingly discernible, especially given the escalating demand for machine learning model training and the associated computational needs.

As a cornerstone of machine learning operations, Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) are pivotal in the success of an AI model, aiding both in the training and inference stages. As we enter into Q4 2023, the insatiable appetite for computational resources, fueled by AI and ML technologies, remains unabated.

Additionally, as ML continues to weave its influence across diverse domains, from curated social media feeds to pivotal medical decision-making processes, its complexities increasingly find themselves hidden behind private companies/APIs. Legitimate reasons for doing so exist, like protecting the sanctity of data privacy, particularly when models are trained on sensitive user data like medical records. However, the more likely scenario is that the company is looking to safeguard proprietary algorithms for monetization.

Given the deepening integration of ML into our daily routines, there arises a pressing demand for assurances that remains at odds with the closed-source AI models of today. These assurances are not only in regard to the models' properties but also the authenticity of their execution. For prominent models like ChatGPT, stakeholders demand consistency in results and seek validation that the models remain unbiased and uncensored. But how?

Blockchain + AI

The blend of AI and blockchain technology represents more than just the unification of two technological domains; it signifies a transformational synergy that could redefine digital innovation and decentralization. Blockchain's transparency, security, and decentralization can significantly contribute to how AI data is stored, shared, and utilized. This integration promises to instill greater trust in AI systems by providing an immutable ledger for AI transactions and decisions, thereby mitigating concerns over data manipulation or misuse.

Projects like Bittensor, Fetch.ai, Akash Network, Render Network, and Gensyn exemplify the potential applications of AI and blockchain integration. For instance, Bittensor is a decentralized network aiming to democratize AI by creating a platform for various decentralized commodity markets united under a single token system. It employs unique incentive mechanisms and a subnetwork architecture to foster a competitive environment where AI model development and improvement are incentivized.

AI Agents: Enhancing Blockchain Functionality

One compelling manifestation of AI and blockchain synergy lies in the development of AI agents. These agents represent a practical fusion of AI and blockchain technologies, offering the potential to enhance blockchain performance and expand its use cases. Evolving from rudimentary task bots, AI agents now operate with greater autonomy and sophistication. They can facilitate transaction processing, hold and exchange valuable assets on behalf of users, and even envision a future where AI agents become a primary category of users on the blockchain.

Verification and Risk Management through Cryptography

One notable area of impact is data management and security. AI systems, which rely on large volumes of data for learning and improvement, can benefit from blockchain's ability to securely and transparently share data across platforms and stakeholders. This not only ensures data integrity but also fosters collaborative AI research and development, breaking down the data silos that often impede innovation.

Effective identification verification through cryptography is essential, particularly for distinguishing between human and AI interactions. Blockchain provides a platform for robust verification mechanisms, including:

Cryptographic Proof via Digital Signatures: This method leverages digital signatures generated using a private key, known only to the creator, and verified using publicly available public keys. It ensures the authenticity of transactions and interactions.
IPFS and Merkle Trees: The integration of IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) and Merkle Trees serves as a powerful tool for verifying the integrity of data sets and AI models. Any alteration to the data triggers an update in the Merkle Trees, preserving content integrity and serving as a verification mechanism.
zkML (Zero-Knowledge Machine Learning): zkML allows for cryptographic proof of AI models without revealing sensitive model details. This technology finds applications in financial services, smart contracts, legal processes, and more, enhancing privacy and security.

Limitations to Consider: It's important to note that some cryptographic models may undergo training and optimization off-chain using AI. This raises the question of whether AI could potentially manipulate cryptographic proofs like zkML if it reaches a high level of performance in the future.

crypto + AI ecosystem — Source: Galaxy Digital Research

Token-Based Incentives to Drive AI Autonomy

To enable AI models to operate autonomously and efficiently, token-based incentives can play a pivotal role. These incentives serve as rewards for AI agents and models when they perform in alignment with desired outcomes. In the cryptocurrency space, tokens and projects like Bittensor (TAO), Autonolas (OLAS), and others affiliated with AI have demonstrated strong performance, even during bear markets. This highlights the growing belief and momentum surrounding AI and blockchain convergence.

Bittensor (TAO)

Bittensor (TAO) represents a groundbreaking decentralized network that functions as a global collective brain akin to a network of distributed 'neurons.' In a manner mirroring the synergy of neurons in the human brain, these machine-learning models collaborate to process information collectively.

What sets Bittensor apart is its utilization of a unique blockchain architecture built on the Substrate framework, the same framework powering Polkadot. This architecture underpins a decentralized machine-learning protocol, empowering the creation of purpose-built blockchains designed for seamless connectivity. As AI becomes increasingly integral to the Web3 landscape, Bittensor's innovative approach places it at the forefront of this transformative convergence.

Ocean Protocol (OCEAN)

Ocean Protocol (OCEAN) emerges as a decentralized, secure, and transparent data exchange platform, bridging the gap between businesses and individuals seeking to share data. AI integration plays a pivotal role, enabling the provision of AI-powered data services that enhance data sharing and utilization.

At the heart of the Ocean Protocol ecosystem lies its native token, OCEAN. This token serves as a central incentive and payment method, incentivizing active network participation and facilitating transactions related to data and AI services. As the demand for secure and transparent data exchange continues to grow in the Web3 era, Ocean Protocol is poised to play a crucial role in this evolving landscape.

Render (RNDR)

The Render Network is a decentralized GPU rendering network that is built on the Ethereum, Polygon, and, soon, Solana blockchain. The network allows users to share their unused GPU power with others, and in return, they earn rewards.

The Render Network is designed to solve a number of problems for digital creators. First, it can save them time and money. By sharing their unused GPU power, they can avoid having to purchase their own high-end GPUs, which can be expensive. Second, the Render Network can help to reduce the environmental impact of rendering. By decentralizing the rendering process, the Render Network can help to reduce the amount of energy that is used for rendering.

The Render Network offers a number of benefits to users. First, it can help them to earn profits. By contributing their rendering power to the network, they can earn RNDR tokens, which can be traded on exchanges. Second, the Render Network can help them to save money. By using the network to render their projects, they can avoid having to purchase their own high-end GPUs.

The Render Network (RNDR) is an innovative platform that leverages blockchain technology to provide an efficient, powerful, and capable alternative in the GPU rendering market. Its business model is designed to scale up linearly to meet growing demands for GPU rendering services, offering users the ability to process intricate files that would be difficult to complete locally. By utilizing the Render Token (RNDR), the network ensures a seamless and decentralized rendering experience for its users.

The Render Network's unique proposition stems from its ability to harness the power of blockchain technology, which enables a more efficient and transparent rendering process. This approach not only reduces costs for users but also allows for greater accessibility and scalability of rendering services. Additionally, the network's use of the Render Token (RNDR) as a form of currency facilitates transactions and incentivizes participation, further strengthening the platform's ecosystem.

What Is Rendering?

The practice of rendering, also known as image synthesis, involves the use of a computer program to create a lifelike or abstract image from a 2D or 3D model. The image created through this method is known as the render.

A scene file, which houses multiple models, includes objects structured in a strictly regulated language or data format. This file encapsulates elements such as geometry, viewpoint, texture, lighting, and shading data that delineate the virtual scene.

The information captured within the scene file is subsequently funneled into a rendering program. The rendering program processes this data, ultimately converting it into a digital image or raster graphics image file.

The term 'rendering' draws a parallel to an artist's representation of a scene. One popular example is the visual effects in many modern comic book movies to create a photorealistic suit of armor or fantasy world. The experienced artist must encode dozens of elements into the algorithm, which then calculates how each pixel of the final image should appear, relying on the models, textures, lights, and camera view. This procedure is not only scientifically intricate but also highly computationally intensive. Nevertheless, it is a critical process employed universally in the creation of every CGI scene seen in movies, video games, and TV shows today.

The RNDR token is the native utility token of the Render Network and plays a crucial role in powering the platform's ecosystem. As an ERC-20 token, the RNDR token serves multiple purposes within the platform, including:

Incentivizing Participation: The RNDR token functions as a reward for users, known as Node Operators, who contribute their computational resources (GPU power) to the network for rendering tasks. This incentive mechanism encourages users to participate in the network, which in turn ensures the availability of rendering resources and helps maintain the platform's efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Payment for Services: Users, referred to as Creators, can utilize the RNDR token to pay for rendering services, digital assets, and other resources available on the platform. This creates a demand for the token and establishes a sustainable economic cycle within the ecosystem.
Governance: The RNDR token also serves as a means of governance within the platform, allowing token holders to vote on proposals and participate in the decision-making process. This ensures that the platform remains community-driven and transparent, with users having a say in its future development and direction.

Decentralized Compute

The innovation of decentralized computing networks via blockchain technology has marked a transformative shift in our approach to the prevalent GPU shortfall. Decentralized computing networks ingeniously link parties seeking computational capabilities to systems laden with untapped CPU and GPU power. With this new ability to tap into the extensive reservoir of dormant GPUs, these networks emerge as a potential solution to the prevailing supply-demand misalignment. Additionally, their pricing structures tend to be more competitive than their centralized counterparts, given the negligible overheads for individuals or institutions proffering their unused resources.

Broadly, decentralized compute networks bifurcate into two categories: General Purpose (GP) and Specific Purpose (SP). GP networks emulate a decentralized digital cloud, offering computational resources for an array of tasks. Their operational design is reminiscent of platforms like Airbnb, in which clients rent server capacity from vendors who retain the discretion to establish their price points. Akash Network epitomizes the GP compute network, providing an eclectic mix of services, from deploying machine learning inference models to managing rendering workloads.

In contrast, SP compute networks cater to specialized applications. Their architecture typically integrates computational resources, evoking the prowess of a supercomputer. Within SP networks, the pricing matrix often hinges on a gas mechanism or a variable steered by the user community.

Gensyn, a blockchain protocol tailored to cater to machine learning, aims to "facilitate and authenticate off-chain deep learning operations." Its decentralized framework bypasses traditional intermediaries like AWS, directly bridging developers aspiring to train AI models with a diverse computational resource pool, encompassing CPUs, GPUs, and even personal gaming systems.

zkML

In the world of blockchain and decentralized systems, ensuring the validity and authenticity of information is paramount. With the rise of Web3 and its promise of a decentralized internet, ensuring trust without centralization becomes a significant challenge. This is especially true for 'oracles,' which provide external data to smart contracts.

In traditional centralized systems, trust is implicit. For example, you trust your bank to show the correct balance in your account. But in decentralized systems, how do you ensure that external information, like market prices, fed into a smart contract is reliable and hasn't been tampered with? This is what’s known as the Oracle Problem.

However, a new wave of computing projects is now leveraging zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to verify computational integrity for machine learning, giving rise to a sector known as zero-knowledge machine learning (zkML). ZkML not only enables AI on-chain but also offers broader applications such as privacy-preserving machine learning and verifiable machine learning.

As previously discussed, in today's digital landscape, users who access APIs are often left in the position of trusting that the data they retrieve is as expected. There is very little transparency or assurance extended to the user. zkML is a tool that provides mathematical assurance that users obtain the data they've sought. zkML further allows for a confirmation that model-training data has been sourced directly from the blockchain instead of merely being imported from elsewhere.

So, what does "zero-knowledge" mean, and how is any of this possible? Enter ZK-SNARKs, a cryptographic proof that allows someone to prove they have specific knowledge without divulging that information. What makes ZK-SNARKs particularly fascinating in the AI realm is their ability to permit ML model owners to authenticate their model's genuine execution, all without divulging the weights or other potentially proprietary information. Thanks to this

mathematical marvel, users can get mathematical certainty that the prover, in this case, the ML or AI company, is delivering that data as expected. This increased level of transparency and scrutiny into AI and ML helps to counter some of the current risks associated with single companies running these models with closed-source code and inputs.

Conclusion

In the fast-moving world of AI and machine learning development, the challenges lie not only in the computational constraints but also in the ethical and political landscapes that underpin these technologies. The powerful synergy of AI and blockchain innovations offers a holistic solution that, on one hand, promises to alleviate the computational crunch by utilizing dormant resources and, on the other, aims to establish transparency and trust in a traditionally opaque realm.

Platforms like Akash Network and Gensyn underscore the potential of decentralized computing, while innovations such as zkML with its ZK-SNARKs cryptography highlight the strides taken towards ensuring verifiable and unbiased machine learning executions. As we tread further into this future of AI and blockchain technology, it is imperative for users to remain astute, embracing the innovations that not only drive efficiency but also uphold the values of transparency, authenticity, and decentralization.

Loading...